#BLOKADA VS STOPAD 2019 INSTALL#
#BLOKADA VS STOPAD 2019 ANDROID#
#BLOKADA VS STOPAD 2019 SOFTWARE#

Then again it doesn't get used for anything with high throughput so perhaps they only throttle when it looks like bulk transfers are happening or the effect of the throttle just isn't apparent for my interactive use-cases. That VPN is using OpenVPN with a UDP transport. I've not noticed performance issues beyond those expected due to signal quality when using work's VPN over a tethered phone using EE. > Unfortunately, my provider (EE, UK) throttles UDP traffic something rotten And, compared to ZeroTier (where I was coming from) I miss out on a nice website configuration, but I get back a CLI one. The EdgeOS port is sometimes out-of-date but its made by a 3rd party.

#BLOKADA VS STOPAD 2019 ANDROID#

For example the VPN is gone on Android when the app gets updated, and there's no official Windows client (though I don't use Windows right now). You only need very minimal, basic knowledge about networking and public key cryptography. The performance is great (both throughput and latency, even of the userspace ports). The configuration is straightforward (way less complex than OpenVPN), wg-quick(8) is ace, the macOS and Android UIs work very well. My experience with WireGuard has been fantastic.

Quad9 by default also blocks porn websites. For me, the website which breaks is AliExpress. My partner sometimes has a website which breaks, especially when she's shopping online. Namely ditch IOS for this and other reasons.

#BLOKADA VS STOPAD 2019 SOFTWARE#

If your mobile platform doesn't allow someone to release such software for your platform use a different mobile platform. Browser addons remain the obvious choice.

#BLOKADA VS STOPAD 2019 INSTALL#

To avoid ads in apps don't install apps with ads. In conclusion addressing ads via dns/routers wherein you intend to view some content that requires selectively disabling said feature is a complex and grossly ineffective solution. Using custom dns even if there is an easy escape hatch to disable/enable it relatively quickly is STILL a global solution which implicitly requires turning it on and off manually and incurring a small time cost per operation. Using a solution that relies on a custom vpn is stupid in that it prevents you from using an actual vpn to increase your privacy. On net you will ultimately invest over 400x the time for a worse solution. This is on top of the 60 minutes you spent figuring out the complex solution that only works on your local network buying hardware, configuring hardware. This means that while I spent 14 seconds you spent 47 minutes. If you use one of these 7 sites 3 times per week you will incur a 6 second cost not just to click but to actually authenticate and start receiving data from the new net. If you regularly use 7 sites that are annoying in this fashion you have invested 14 seconds.Д«y contrast lets discuss switching networks one of which uses dns to filter out ads. This takes aprox 2 seconds once ever for each site. Click icon at top of window, click disable, click reload. It takes 3 clicks to disable adblocking for a particular site once ever.

I don't think this is a reasonable analysis. The only machine I don't use uBlock is on Kali because I want to see the website exactly as it is being served. The more, the merrier.ДЄs a backup measure I use Firefox with uBlock. That being said, I really like how Blokada and DNS66 are available in F-Droid, and require minimal technical knowledge to set up.

My setup does far more than just blocking ads, and works transparent as long as the client is connected through WireGuard (which works seamlessly over LTE and public WiFi). It works extremely well for me, and all my clients also get to connect to Nextcloud running on the Synology. My Synology NAS is backup (with regards to the DNS-based Pi-Hole blocking) taking the adblocking load off the router (there's no redundancy for WireGuard endpoint though). I'm using Pi-Hole on an Ubiquiti router together with WireGuard and DNSSEC.

Blokada vs stopad 2019